Gravitational Stellar Wobble


   The gravitational effects on stars or wobble that is now being detected by astronomical observations have become the primary tool for identifying potential planetary systems, trying to answer that age old question, is our solar system unique and are we alone?

   The stellar Doppler shifts in stellar spectrum light  observed, is a compromised path of final motion resulting from combined complex interactions between gravity, repulsion, magnetic and other subatomic particle flows yet to be discovered by mankind emanating from many cosmic objects that transverse all parallel universes that cause an affect on the stellar object. Although mankind assumes the primary gravitational tugs affecting a stellar object is from a single attractive source, a planet within close proximity of the star. But what force would account for a massive object based on  planetary models developed on Earth suggesting a hydrogen based planet due to its mass, which could not exist within the close proximity of the heat signature emitted from the host star?

   Current theories on gravitational stellar wobble would invalidate the planetary theories involving gas giants. How would a planet coalesce so close to a star, attain a substantial mass and revolve about the central solar mass in a matter of a few days? Does this concept present a logical explanation of planetary movement or is this just another contradiction in your theories? Lets review your laws of centrifugal motion and the formation of a  collapsing planetary-solar  accretion disk.

   When your concept of planetary formation, which involves coalescing of matter, a gravitational host with enough mass to maintain capture of a rapidly revolving object. Did you really think the your theory of planetary formation through completely? As a star collapses and its mass establishes a  gravitational field in relation to mass vs. volume. As it shrinks its moment of rotational pivot about its axis increases, but this rotational torque translates little of its rotation force from the star to the accretion disk surrounding the star as gravity decrease as a function of distance. So according to mankind's theories solar system should not exist, but be captured as the star's gravitational field increases as a function reduction of the radius of mass.

  We will address 2 common points related to stellar wobble, first, unlit or visible stars in a multi stellar system. Stellar wobble detected by the Doppler effect assumes one side of the equation acceleration towards the planet as it revolves. Your laws of motion states an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. So this planet causes a movement towards it, but its orbit is balanced by orbital velocity and a specific distance from the stellar gravitational source. Stellar wobble theories never consider the F = Ma to reverse the motion closing the distance between the planet and star on the opposite side of the predicted planetary orbit. You have assumed the planet's orbit was not affected and follows the same path to attract the star back. How, your gravitational formulas are based on distance as the masses in the original equation do not change enough to affect the orbital relationship, which has decreased on one side and magically attracted on the other to maintain its original orbital radii position. With less force, due to a shift away from the original position, how do you reverse momentum, you don't. If you accelerate a star towards a planet the orbit degrades and eventually the planet is assimilated, there is no counter motion.

   Stellar wobble is the process of a star finding an equilibrium between similar massive objects especially in multi stellar systems. There is a bounce about a static point as this process, between the force of gravity and repulsion resolves itself. It is this movement that the Doppler spectrum measurements of starlight are detecting. Yes, most stars have planets, and many more than humans can imagine. A certain percentage has life in various forms of development. We are not along or are in danger from benevolent alien life forms as some media outlets and past administration government sponsored sites still in operation with advanced funds would lead you to believe. The ability to move about the universe, control time, transport matter, move planets, read your mind, control that which we call nature, with all this power what has stopped them in the past or now? When presented with an opinion, do not believe it because of a name, examine the content and judge it by what you see, sense and experience. This is about to end and will change. This is the process of life, through distress and turmoil the population moves or is forced towards a tipping point where the ultimate decision is determined by a set of common experiences.

   Addressing the second point, the dip in light intensity as a predicted planet passes in front. Light diffuses and can be inhibited within a close proximity, but you were taught by Einstein that gravity bends the path of light. Do you not think over the vast reaches of space, the light blocked by a planet over time and distance differentials in sub atomic particle flow due to pressure voids would bend light into the gap? Particle movement shows when over a distance a void is quickly filled due to a natural process of equalization. There are many factors involved in the fusion process of a star, primarily a subdued pulsing of its intensity due to a phased process occurring within the stellar core. But, the largest point you never considered are Sun Spots, they rotate across the visible surface and cannot be differentiated from a passing planet with current technology.

   Astrophysicists presented exciting news to the world of discoveries only to come up with a planetary orbital model that contradicts all logic related to current theories of mankind. How can a Jupiter sized planet, under current consensus be composed primarily of light frozen elements of hydrogen and helium according to present day astronomical theories revolve in close proximity around a star in a matter of days? Any Jupiter type planetary mass exhibiting the orbital and thermal heat absorption dynamics of Mercury would vaporize all light elements down to its gravitational attractant rocky core.

   The introduction of extreme solar heat would create a loss of gravitational force as accretion of the mass attracts only stable solid mass as all light elements quickly dissipates. Its atmosphere would precipitate into the universe due to its velocity and atmospheric pressure variances between the hot core and the vacuum of outer space while revolving around the star. Thus, almost all solar planets presently considered "found", could not exist under the contradictory rules of mankindís science. Doubts lets examine the current technology associated with gravitational wobble.


What's Wrong with this Diagram?

If we were to designate the position of the unseen planet in the upper diagram to the right at 90 degrees along the circular path, how would a gravitational between the 2 objects create a force 90 degrees away from the line of force between both objects? It wouldn't, the attraction for the blue shifted light would occur with the planet at 180 degrees position along the path as the planet and star shifted towards each other in order to create the shorten wave length of light emitted from the stellar source. This shift towards each other does not occur at specific points as one would be led to believe, but according to mankind's gravitational formulas, happens along the entire orbital path. The result, really would a planet spiraling inward towards the stellar gravitational source due to the attraction while orbital velocity the counter could not compensate for the shifting new force in what seems a balanced equation.


Image courtesy of :


All Rights Reserved: © Copyright 2002, 2010

Related Articles:

Extra Solar Planets

Return to Main Menu


Return to Title Page1